Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
Brian E Carpenter
2023-04-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/mwbTmNTru4RE3eEjysoahNUbmyI/
3295752
2058241
Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
Nick Buraglio
2023-04-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/3begWTq03L7wc-BtEJ4O3sVDFNI/
3295626
2058241
Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-04-03
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/_9gfkGaRSCjtkRy0YhEeKigc5uU/
3295490
2058241
Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
David Farmer
2023-04-02
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/9pkn4G-Bwz8SinGNSE26c3OCvms/
3295355
2058241
Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-04-02
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/bVJvg3ngcayjJ6dipUrQezk5qE0/
3295342
2058241
Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-04-02
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/4Zu_7XaW7bQY7fUxIcCZ2n93EeA/
3295339
2058241
Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
Mark Smith
2023-04-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/OsDViwxFRoXuxkD9XeTrUpcSlD4/
3295247
2058241
Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
Brian E Carpenter
2023-04-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/TEZq6KHAuXXhpbFQo_07U1QsHug/
3295235
2058241
Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
Vasilenko Eduard
2023-04-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/xOGm9H6ujPS_Rr2T8SUG1k1JM9M/
3295226
2058241
Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
Nick Buraglio
2023-04-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/zIQwS3xDPVX3S3fSuE41lvN7azk/
3295069
2058241
Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pdRe: [IPv6] [v6ops] Smaller prefixes (/64-/96?) for draft-collink-v6ops-ent64pd
Ole Troan
2023-03-31
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/OvTV6lvt1r93vd3aU3WcCIzxNSw/
3294902
2058241
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bitRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
Fernando Gont
2023-02-19
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/nYRqVNJ90ruTbO1qpI9-Q8bRXzg/
3277768
2051768
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bitRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
Fernando Gont
2023-02-19
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/9jTRH1NPY8-T78ardoxqDHUzxzY/
3277766
2051768
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bitRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
Theogaraj, Isaac
2023-02-18
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/Qa7IKaNji2c_2HVp0nQiF1XOVIU/
3277572
2051768
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bitRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
David Farmer
2023-02-17
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/CKmKuMnT0OlhBC6bQ3HB5U46z0E/
3277365
2051768
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bitRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
Theogaraj, Isaac
2023-02-17
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/GAEUoxloSc0aq4hDk42_o5QOnE8/
3277353
2051768
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bitRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
David Farmer
2023-02-17
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/UThfru6g01n71flpi6U9gwQX0Hc/
3277343
2051768
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit - eliminate the doubt about the Privacy Bit being like the Evil Bit, or notRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit - eliminate the doubt about the Privacy Bit being like the Evil Bit, or not
Alexandre Petrescu
2023-02-17
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/BWmgSn1Y-Mf_ReUo8SihDX45r8E/
3277311
2051768
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bitRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
Theogaraj, Isaac
2023-02-17
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/hEupwVdMygRsfj0PoWmENP_SJNg/
3277308
2051768
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bitRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
Ted Lemon
2023-02-17
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/EsDTNVzsQcvU3n1nYk0Z4qNubRI/
3277306
2051768
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bitRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
Theogaraj, Isaac
2023-02-17
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/NYBgEFZzNKst-xcFhdMlc9u5gMM/
3277283
2051768
Re: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bitRe: [IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
Michael Richardson
2023-02-17
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/UTMptkH-SpxzHcYcq7y--6IZDO4/
3277259
2051768
[IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit[IPv6] IETF RFC draft proposal: IPv6 Privacy bit
Theogaraj, Isaac
2023-02-17
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/Qc1M5kIeWuJvX9BG7FuTQ2P5qM0/
3277094
2051768
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-grand-05: (with COMMENT)Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-grand-05: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk
2021-07-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/EnRpyO9pD7lWbqQhs4tB-Xy9Fuc/
3048925
1960689
Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-grand-05: (with COMMENT)Re: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-grand-05: (with COMMENT)
Jen Linkova
2021-07-01
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/kvd7buzj8JLPnjS-JaUzs4ajoEU/
3048643
1960689
Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-grand-05: (with COMMENT)Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-grand-05: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
2021-06-30
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/oASTFdQNyOftjns-5ggOtT0xJtg/
3048483
1960689
Protocol Action: 'Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-12.txt)Protocol Action: 'Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-12.txt)
The IESG
2020-12-14
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/H0dw2dsPhjBHPidCLPRl93XqWQU/
2975600
1929784
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-12-07
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/yzbaKoJqEw-VeIcPitZsh0_8ymI/
2972556
1927050
RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-30
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/G-8_ESG7YdwWKW0puFfZp7l-xD8/
2969754
1927050
RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-30
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/wRWCmVUxNLSi-xVINa-BG8nfVIs/
2969718
1927050
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-30
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/aa1SodKQlhq8FjvkolPMzo7I1ow/
2969648
1927050
RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-30
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/0bhUuVoXxS0MWvlOCVuBZs6SjI0/
2969541
1927050
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Philip Homburg
2020-11-26
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/cbV9PBTyH--25zaFLMrBWn8ly_Y/
2968662
1927050
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Alexandre Petrescu
2020-11-26
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/i5uF9nnoFpNR7iJUox0YrW38Trk/
2968619
1927050
RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-25
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/_MGAhMgcoGei8qIMTPFlZrobF4A/
2968344
1927050
RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-25
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/mXVfMbQFYP55AU2RW5z6ltFkl4M/
2968339
1927050
RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-25
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/g9UCjXlQZm1a_Bato8K5FrJQUcs/
2968337
1927050
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
tom petch
2020-11-25
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/j5QQhP1hz8gZoakW5mbpoArFlpQ/
2968335
1927050
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Philip Homburg
2020-11-25
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/x-_5cIE2S0cXr6Cb55oArSuxVq4/
2968323
1927050
Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Templin (US), Fred L
2020-11-25
ipv6
None
/arch/msg/ipv6/AQN3ld8-hw381HK4CMjEAEmhhEo/
2968292
1927050